AS BIKERS PREPARE A back on the bike, THE PRO-TOUR WELCOMES ALL TO BECOME THE UCI WORLD TOUR. AND WE ALREADY 'A NEW' perplexing.
THEN THE "ASSOCORRIDORI, ITALIAN AND WORLD THAT CALL FOR BIOLOGICAL passport system.
Several years ago, Italy was the lion's share in the old World Cup. Maurizio Fondriest Michele Bartoli, Gianni Bugno to Paolo Bettini. Then here is the UCI Pro-Tour with the statement of Danilo Di Luca. Meanwhile, however, began the quarrels between race organizers and the great historical leaders of the UCI. The Pro-Tour so went ahead to force compromise, creating skepticism among experts. Now we change again - At least the name - although the criteria have remained virtually unchanged. It is a novelty in this regard raises some doubts.
There are changes to the scores that give the value of each Sports Groups (UCI score for the "ranking"). The estimate will be built with the points for the team for what will be the season the following year and not that just ended. See the Liquigas team who finished in 2nd place in 2010, and early next should not even be among the top five, because some athletes who have changed coat. It would just create at least some kind of compromise, the cyclist who change team "leaves" automatically in 30% of points won in his season at the GS. In so doing, a GS would have at least a just a field minimum of points for having perhaps grown a runner, and I did become a winner.
This explains the choice of Geox the assignment of Sastre and Menchov. With the points they hoped to have the place almost certainly important in racing, and not having to make the effort to earn it with the results. I remember when at the end of the decade since the '90 U.S. Postal's Armstrong wanted at all costs take the Tour, but it was a new formation. For the discussion of the scores had to run a large number of races for "mature" enough to merit a score participation Alps to race. Then managed to earn the invitation (to the Tour has been invited and are not part of law), opening the golden season for Texas. Other
speech that comes out is the biological passport. The issue involving the Italian Pellizotti did discuss. Stopping a cyclist for months, losing the season, only to find themselves confronted with evidence of not having enough evidence to stop the athlete. Meanwhile, the season of the Liquigas rider has gone to the dogs. Not for nothing Alberto Contador turned to the lawyers who had attended our climber.
The association of runners, Italian and international, to be able to ask the UCI have more parties in the case of action against cyclists or cyclists affected by troubles with doping. The associations of the runners are 9 physicians experienced in these quarrels sports physicals, which can act as "experts" in the courts for sports. But they would like the UCI did not do more to filter in the selection of athletes, and that these 9 experts may have the data for all the athletes involved nell'Assocorridori World (850), and not only the abnormal data of the athletes. There will be an increase in paper work, then going to confuse things even more? The last thing you need to cycling, which is found to have bottles of water the only What still totally transparent.
close with the news that the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency), the head seems to have half a mind to make up to 4 years disqualification for more serious cases of doping. It would be nice had proposed the idea of \u200b\u200bradiation in case of trafficking of doping substances. Already take drugs is serious, but others can also do this work because it is too.
0 comments:
Post a Comment