REGRET? ANGER? JUSTICE? SURPRISED? A
"Judgement" that stinks of politics. MAYBE NOT IN THE FEAR OF CREATING A HOLE AFTER THE CRACKS ON THE SURFACE glimpsed. If
Pellizotti had prevailed at the International Cycling Union, would have created a hole, legally exploited by others, that the UCI could not counter. This is perhaps why the Agency has fielded fine lawyers, to prevent the Italian cyclist was able to win.
Pellizotti's victory was the beginning of the end for the Biological Passport. One instrument popular in intent but criticized in the assessments. Probably the position of the rider in the international arena has made sure that his case would last many months. For Contador things have gone forward in a reasonable time, and hit a nice ass (if such it was) for English, that his case has come in the autumn, when the season was shooting the last appointments. While
Sister Alessandra's eyes sparkle when responsibility and blame can be attached to the President McQuaid in cycling (we expect charges against him even if punctured by Vincenzo Nibali, stay tuned), the UCI has in his staff also vice-presidents , advisers, secretaries, etc. ... including those Di Rocco and Adorno. In a matter of policy where the stench is enough strong, remember to account. Probably the same
Pellizotti understood that his is a "sentence" winds policy, and for this reason has decided that it is worthwhile to hold out until the end. Not because it is him, but more for what he represented his case.
The regret is, as Di Luca is still in the group, but he was able to return because when he spilled what he knew he did it for the young (Gazzetta dello Sport, 16 October). The discount on the disqualification for the cooperation he asked him, ol'avranno obliged to receive those of the UCI and the MF?
0 comments:
Post a Comment